Smoking in Public Places
When a smoker smokes at a public place, it is not only the smoker who sustains the harm. Even those who are not smoking, but are in the company of smokers are also harmed.
Reasons Why Smoking in Public is Bad
- Non-smokers feel very uncomfortable when they are exposed to the smoke of a cigarette.
- If a person smokes in public area, then even non-smokers have to inhale the smoke emitted out by them.
- These people who are not habituated for cigarette smoke are put to risk of various diseases.
- There are men, women, boys and girls of all ages at public places. The smoke that is inhaled passively by young children can be very detrimental for their health.
- The sight of watching someone smoking may attract teenagers to indulge in the habit of smoking.
- Smoking has been banned in cinema halls or in conference halls.
- At many places, there are smoking chambers attached to prominent public places and big offices. Those, who cannot do without smoking have to go to those chambers to have a smoke. In public places, smoking is not permitted.
Smoking Banned in Public Places
In India, there is nationwide ban on smoking in public areas under the provisions of Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) and Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places Rules, 2008.
Smoking is not allowed at public places such as shopping malls, restaurants, bars, offices, public transports, airports, railway stations, cinema halls, hospitals, banquet halls, libraries, etc. However, smoking is not banned on roads and inside private cars.
Those who do not smoke find the smoke of a cigarette to be intolerable – their head begins to ache if someone is puffing out the smoke around them.
Category: Social Issues in India
Ban Smoking in Public Places Essay
This is a ban smoking in public places essay. It is an example of an essay where you have to give your opinion as to whether you agree or disagree.
The sample answer shows you how you can present the opposing argument first, that is not your opinion, and then present your opinion in the following paragraph.
It is always a good idea to present a balanced essay which presents both sides of the argument, but you must always make it very clear what your opinion is and which side of the argument you support.
Ban Smoking in Public Places Essay
Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. As a result of this, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action.
Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. Firstly, they say that passive smokers make the choice to breathe in other people’s smoke by going to places where it is allowed. If they would prefer not to smoke passively, then they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted. In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where they wish.
However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban. First and foremost, it has been proven that tobacco consists of carcinogenic compounds which cause serious harm to a person’s health, not only the smoker. Anyone around them can develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sites in the body. It is simply not fair to impose this upon another person. It is also the case that people’s health is more important than businesses. In any case, pubs and restaurants could adapt to a ban by, for example, allowing smoking areas .
In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public places. This would improve the health of thousands of people, and that is most definitely a positive development.
This essay is well organized and presented.
The introduction is clear - note how it follows the ban smoking in public places essay question - it paraphrases the information in order to introduce the topic and the argument.
The argument against a ban on smoking in public places is presented first. It is made clear that it is not the authors opinion by the topic sentence:
"Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons".
And also by the use of the word 'they' to refer to the opponents.
The writer then clearly shows they are moving on to the other argument which is their own (and it has clearly been stated in the thesis that this is their argument):
"However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban".
In this paragraph, 'they' is dropped because it is now the writers opinion.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.